5360074256
360 度旋转展示
360°
播放视频
Tough and lightweight the Ronhill Classic Tracksters Running Tight allows for great comfort and performance as the Exertech 100 fabric moves with you. Improved waistband design and internal fob pocket for small necessities.
主要特点:
- Tough, light 4 way stretch Exertech 100, the fabric that moves with you - great comfort and performa
- Women's Tracksters are specifically tailored to the female form
- Internal key pocket for the small necessities
有不准确或缺失的商品信息? 请告诉我们
请选择问题选项
您所反馈的信息已收到!非常感谢您帮助我们改进我们的网站。
Tough and lightweight the Ronhill Classic Tracksters Running Tight allows for great comfort and performance as the Exertech 100 fabric moves with you. Improved waistband design and internal fob pocket for small necessities.
|
|
英码8 |
英码10 |
英码12 |
英码14 |
英码16 |
英码18 |
A. 上胸围 |
cm |
76 - 83cm
|
83 - 88cm
|
88 - 93cm
|
93 - 100cm
|
100 - 105cm
|
105 - 112cm
|
B. 臀围 |
cm |
89 - 91cm
|
91 - 97cm
|
97 - 102cm
|
102 - 107cm
|
107 - 112cm
|
112 - 117cm
|
C. 腰围 |
cm |
61 - 66cm
|
66 - 71cm
|
71 - 76cm
|
76 - 81cm
|
81 - 86cm
|
86 - 91cm
|
D. 内侧腿长 |
cm |
76cm
|
77.5cm
|
79cm
|
80cm
|
81cm
|
82.5cm
|
|
|
英码8 |
英码10 |
英码12 |
英码14 |
英码16 |
英码18 |
A. 上胸围 |
英寸 |
30″ - 321⁄2″
|
321⁄2″ - 341⁄2″
|
341⁄2″ - 361⁄2″
|
361⁄2″ - 391⁄2″
|
391⁄2″ - 411⁄2″
|
411⁄2″ - 44″
|
B. 臀围 |
英寸 |
35″ - 36″
|
36″ - 38″
|
38″ - 40″
|
40″ - 42″
|
42″ - 44″
|
44″ - 46″
|
C. 腰围 |
英寸 |
24″ - 26″
|
26″ - 28″
|
28″ - 30″
|
30″ - 32″
|
32″ - 34″
|
34″ - 36″
|
D. 内侧腿长 |
英寸 |
30″
|
301⁄2″
|
31″
|
311⁄2″
|
32″
|
321⁄2″
|
您可选择以下送递方式将此产品和您购物篮内的商品一起运送到美国:
- 标准追踪送递: 预计送达时间 星期一 2021/1/25 – ¥111.48
再消费 ¥530.19 即享追踪包邮
- 有追踪号递送: 预计送达时间 星期四 2021/1/21 – ¥155.93
我们非常乐意为任何在Wiggle购买的商品提供退款服务,您需要在购买日内365天联系我们,此退货不适用于Wiggle礼券、营养食品以及和个性化的商品,瑕疵品除外。
退货商品必须符合退货条件,除非是瑕疵品,否则退回商品必须是全新未使用状态,退回时必须和原包装一并寄回。。
Wiggle会承担瑕疵商品的退货邮费。
更多关于Wiggle 退换货政策的说明
Ronhill - Women's Classic Tracksters is rated
2.0 out of
5 by
1.
Rated 2 out of
5
by
aprilZ from
this pants is not tight enough and I can put another legging inside, and it is not warm enough for winter, say 8 degree minus, but considering the price, but that bad.
Date published: 2015-02-16